I know that there is no blog assignment this week, but I'm finding that this course is incredibly timely and the comments and discussion really helpful, since I'm basically new to the formal process of Project Management.
I've been tagged at school to be the sponsor for the school's chapter of the Science National Honor Society (different than the NHS you may remember from school). Since this is a brand new group, I have to plan how students will be notified of possible induction, the application and criteria process, and the actual induction ceremony after that.
The topics from the last few weeks in class have been rather helpful, since I now find myself breaking down all of the tasks, trying to estimate times, and identifying stakeholders. The stakeholders part has been surprising; the data processing IT guy at Central office, the guidance counselors to verify student GPAs, the events coordinator, culinary instructor, students, science teachers, other core teachers,.... At times, it seems like it's a never-ending list.
And on top of that, my principal has asked me to help the VP's convert some of our standard, start-of-the-year required meetings to web-format. Doing this would allow only those teachers that need the training (newer teachers with 0-3 years teaching experience and those needing a refresher) to complete the training on their own time, and would free up much needed hours for all teachers during our 4-day pre-school work sessions. It's a daunting task, as my experience with the multimedia side of our program has pretty much been limited to what we have done for the Walden courses. I am much more comfortable with the ID process and even the PM process (just not the formality of parts of it; language, forms, etc.). Also adding a bit to the stress is the limited time. There are only 5 weeks until the faculty returns to school and there are possibly 5-8 training modules that would be converted to web form.
Enjoy your weekend!
UPDATE: So the number of modules has decreased after the conversation with the principal today, but the initial meeting to discuss the project won't happen until next week. We decided that if we could get the first module up and running by the time teachers returned, then we could add additional modules during the school year.
Thursday, July 19
Thursday, July 12
Communicating Effectively: Comparisons on Modality
The Art of Effective Communication
This week we are to review a message delivered through three different communication modes: email, voice mail, and face-to-face (F2F) conversation. Jane needs data and information from Mark to include in a report that is quickly approaching a submission deadline. Each mode of communication contains the same script and message, and all can be classified as informal communications. "Informal communications occur as people think of the information they want to share" (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton & Kramer, 2008, p. 357).My interpretations changed slightly between the written text mode and the voice mail mode because of hearing the tonality and inflection in Jane's voice. It also changed between the voice mail and the F2F because of body language displayed by Jane in the video clip. Since the script for the three modes was identical, my perception may have been altered slightly by the time I viewed the F2F mode.
I think that the true meaning and intent of Jane's message is best conveyed by the voice mail mode of communication in this example. The physical communication modes (voice mail, F2F) hold more urgency with me, as the sender has thought that she may be able to catch Mark at his desk, either by phone or stopping at Mark's desk, and needs a more immediate answer.
The email provides the best form of documentation of the three modes. It clearly states the purpose and reason for the message, and that the sender expects a reply. The email does not convey the same urgency, as specific dates and times are not included in the message. How long does Mark have to get the information to Jane? When is her deadline? Written communication does not allow the recipient to ask questions about the message (Portny, et al, 2008). Although those questions could be asked during each mode, inclusion of that information would have made the email clearer on the urgency of the situation.
The script and body language in the F2F mode seemed very contrived to me. If Jane is standing there talking to Mark, why would she deliver the message in such a scripted matter? Why not just simply ask Mark for the information? Her crossed arms and wandering eyes made it seem that she was uninterested in both her own message and any reply Mark might have had, which undercut the urgency of her needing the data for her own report. Dr. Stolovitch and his students discuss important components of effective oral communication in the video "Communicating with Stakeholders" (Laureate Education, Inc., n.d.). In the video, Dr. Stolovitch makes note that the non-verbal communication can be just as informative (and often contradictory to) as the verbal communication through the spirit, attitude, tonality, body language, and timing of the message. (Laureate Education, Inc., n.d.).
For time-sensitive actions and messages, a personal conversation, either by phone or in person (not a contrived script) is best to convey urgent and time-sensitive information or requests, followed by an email clearly stating the purpose, specific deliverables, and any agreements reached including deadlines that the parties need to meet. Voice mail and email can be more unpredictable as there is a greater change that Mark may not get the messages until much later in the day, especially if he is in an all-day meeting.
References
Laureate Education, Inc., (n.d.) Communicating with stakeholders. [Video]. Retrieved from https://class.waldenu.edu/webapps/portal/frameset.jsp?tab_tab_group_id=_2_1&url=%2Fwebapps%2Fblackboard%2Fexecute%2Flauncher%3Ftype%3DCourse%26id%3D_1342057_1%26url%3D
Laureate Education, Inc., (n.d.) The art of effective communication. [Multimedia]. Retrieved from http://mym.cdn.laureate-media.com/2dett4d/Walden/EDUC/6145/03/mm/aoc/index.html
Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M. M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Thursday, July 5
Project Post-mortem
Blog Assignment: Learning from
a Project “Post-mortem”
Besides my normal teaching duties at school, every spring I
serve as the Graduation Coordinator for the senior class. As the school is rather large (2300 students,
graduation class of 500+) this project or process can become quite
involved. Between the parent volunteers,
senior class sponsors, administration, sheriff’s department, and vendors, there
are many details that need to be adjusted and communicated each year. The class of 2009 was our first graduating
class, and this year was our largest.
Thankfully, I do not have to do the coordination all by
myself. Each year some of our
administrative and faculty staffs change; I am the one static person on the
Graduation Team that remains constant from year to year (last year I had to
fill in as Mistress of Ceremonies for our senior class Vice Principal who was
out on maternity leave). In this
position, I am able to help newcomers acclimate to their individual roles (our
vice principals are on a rotation and move up as their group of kids move from
one grade to the next), as well as advise the team on how well expectations
were met in previous years, and how we can improve our deliverables for the
coming year.
In some respects, I act as a project manager, in other ways
I am a functional manager. “Functional
managers are responsible for orchestrating their staffs’ assignments among
different projects, as well as providing the resources to allow their staffs to
perform their assignments in accordance with the highest standards of technical
assistance” (Portny, Mantel, Meredith, Shafer, Sutton & Kramer (2008). During graduation practices at the end of the
year, I schedule the sequence of practices, guest speakers, student speakers,
special events, and parent volunteers. I
also instruct the senior class Vice Principal on what he/she needs to
accomplish with the senior class during each day’s practice. The most difficult part of the position is
not having any real authority. As each
role that contributes to the graduation team is either voluntary (in my case)
or part of the job requirements (vice principals), there is no incentive to put
the best effort forward. That being
said, the entire team always wants the graduation process to achieve the best
possible results. Primarily, the drive
is for the students themselves, but also for the parents, guests, VIPs, and the
Board of Education members and Executive Staff from the county offices that
attend.
There have been several aspects of project management that
we have dealt with during the four graduation events since 2009:
Scope creep:
Including a VIP reception and a series of photo booths stretched our resources
and didn’t precisely fit in with the overall project.
Limited
budget: Between the second and third
years, our budget available for graduation decreased. We had to change lighting and sound companies
in order to stay within budget.
Inappropriate
staffing assignments: Staff
personalities were sometimes assigned to less-than-ideal locations on
graduation night (introverted people assigned to deal with ticket holders at
the door, which could sometimes be confrontational).
The team has been able to succeed in the project objective
each year, to the satisfaction of most of the guests and graduates. Our frequent meetings, updates, and
communications have been major factors in that success. For the team, having clearly defined roles
and obligations has also helped. People
are not overwhelmed with any aspect and individuals know what their goals and responsibilities
should be each year. After the ceremony
is complete, and everyone has had a chance to rest, the team holds a
post-mortem to reflect on the good, the bad, and the needs-improvement aspects
of the project.
One part of the process that I wish we could do a little
better is the communications. I know I
mentioned it earlier as one of the strengths of the project, but it also
belongs in the weakness column as well.
The team is pretty good at communicating with each other during monthly
meetings, and with each other when working on related aspects of a particular piece.
The communication does not always
proceed in the same fashion outside of the Graduation Team. The Team is comprised of the Principal, Vice
Principals, a secretary, the guidance department, me, and the senior class
sponsors. It does not include the group
leaders that we utilize on graduation night, such as the faculty member leader
for the ticket-taker group, or the leader for the parking crew. This can, and has, lead to confusion and
miscommunications on expectations and established procedures.
With everything considered, I am surprised every year at the
graduates and my colleagues for the hard work and accomplishments that go into
making graduation happen. And I am also
very thankful that my boss lets me take the day after graduation off.
Reference
Portny, S. E., Mantel, S. J., Meredith, J. R., Shafer, S. M., Sutton, M.
M., & Kramer, B. E. (2008). Project
management: Planning, scheduling, and controlling projects. Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Friday, June 29
Back in the Swing of Things
Welcome and Welcome Back!
I have been on a little hiatus lately from classes. Between work, home, and school, I found that
my attention was far too divided. As
grad school was the optional task, I took a break so that I could focus on work
and family. Now that the school year is
finished (work) and the family situations have improved, I’m back at the grad
work. I had hope of finishing the last
three courses and the program by December, but I have a feeling that it will be
spring before I’m done.
By day, I teach high school Honors and AP physics at a
science/technology magnate school. I am
also the sponsor for the school’s chapter of the Science NHS. At the end of the school year, I am in charge
of organizing our administrators, faculty, staff, vendors, and seniors for the
graduation ceremonies, which comprises of 500+ graduates and 5000+ guests and
VIPs. In some respects, it is similar to
the role of a Project Manager. I have filled
the position of graduation coordinator since the school graduated the first
senior class in 2009. It is a
challenging, and often stressful, role, but it is also fulfilling and
gratifying when everything goes well.
Outside of work and grad school, I married my best friend
last summer and I am a full-time mom to a wonderful 6 year old stepson. My husband and I are involved with a
historical recreation group called the SCA on the weekends (that’s how we met 7
years ago). Aside from that, I am a football
and hockey fan, seamstress and beginning quilter.
Please leave me comments and questions and I look forward to
our course together!
~Shelley
Monday, February 27
Farewell for now to the Grad Program
It's very rare that I blog about non-grad work assignments, so this will be brief.
My husband left about 2.5 weeks ago to begin carving a new life for our family in the hills of SW PA. As I am a full-time teacher, I cannot move until the end of the school year. My stepson is in kindergarten and we decided that he should also finish the school year before making the move. In the grand scheme of things, I now have a very healthy respect for working, single parents. Things have been more than a little hectic during the last two weeks of the course. My stress levels went through the roof and BoyWonder has had a difficult time, too. I cannot feel good about taking so much time away from him while pursuing the Master's program. It's just not fair to him (or my sanity).
So for the short term, I've postponed my last three courses in the MSIDT program until at least the Summer terms, when I have more time and we have fully adjusted to not having Hubby/Daddy around. For those of you continuing with the Project Management course, I wish you the best and look forward to seeing your posts! I can now say that I love my RSS feed and check it daily. :) Hopefully, I will be able to converse with some of you in future courses!
Shelley
My husband left about 2.5 weeks ago to begin carving a new life for our family in the hills of SW PA. As I am a full-time teacher, I cannot move until the end of the school year. My stepson is in kindergarten and we decided that he should also finish the school year before making the move. In the grand scheme of things, I now have a very healthy respect for working, single parents. Things have been more than a little hectic during the last two weeks of the course. My stress levels went through the roof and BoyWonder has had a difficult time, too. I cannot feel good about taking so much time away from him while pursuing the Master's program. It's just not fair to him (or my sanity).
So for the short term, I've postponed my last three courses in the MSIDT program until at least the Summer terms, when I have more time and we have fully adjusted to not having Hubby/Daddy around. For those of you continuing with the Project Management course, I wish you the best and look forward to seeing your posts! I can now say that I love my RSS feed and check it daily. :) Hopefully, I will be able to converse with some of you in future courses!
Shelley
Sunday, February 26
The Future of Distance Learning
What do you think the perceptions of distance learning will be in the
future (in 5-10 years; 10-20 years)?
In the next 5 to 10 years, I think the perceptions of
distance learning will change a great deal.
People are realizing that geographic location does not need to dictate
their access to quality education and that distance can be overcome through the
use of distance learning. The
development of quality distance learning programs will continue during this
time, as education institutions look to established models of successful distance
education, such as the Florida Virtual School, the Digital Dakota Network, and
accredited online universities (Simonson, Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek,
2012). The development of distance
learning institutions will continue to grow, not as just a trend or fad, but as
institutions, government, and businesses continue to cater to and reach a more
diverse and global economy (Siemens, 2010).
Accreditation
will become more important as employers and potential students become more
aware of what quality distance learning can achieve. Institutions offering distance learning
programs will improve their course offerings to utilize the new developments of
technology and communication, offering a more comfortable and engaging learning
environment to students, while meeting (or exceeding) the academic rigor
required by accreditation or industry standards. For established, traditional learning
institutions, this may be a painful process in rethinking how content can be
delivered to learners, how learners and instructors interact, and how to avoid “the
craft approach” (simply transferring face-to-face classroom content to an
online forum without regard to the differences between online instructional
strategies and classroom instructional strategies) (Moller, Foshay, & Huett,
2008, p. 67). The quality of distance
learning programs will be examined when compared to identical programs offered
face-to-face by the same institution in terms of academic fidelity and
integrity, meaning that the distance learning programs ought to have the same
support from the institution in terms of technology, resources, faculty, and
society acceptance (Gambescia & Paolucci, 2009).
Communication
between far-reaching destinations will be all but erased by distance learning
and training. During this time,
technologies and interactive communications will improve, as will the use of
interactive games, multimedia applications and simulations, providing a more
engaging and effective learning environment.
As tools and technologies develop, distance learning and instructional
designers will need to keep pace with the improvements to provide learners with
the practical experience necessary to be successful in the career field.
In the following decade, distance learning programs and
technologies will achieve mainstream acceptance. By that time, it may be that more than half
of working professionals will have received at least some of their education
through distance learning courses.
Communication and multimedia technologies will continue to improve and
new innovations will cause us to rethink (again) how people relate and interact
with one another and the digital world.
Who knows? Simulations and video
conferencing may achieve 3D capabilities that are accessible to everyone.
How can you as an instructional designer be a proponent for improving
societal perceptions of distance learning?
As an instructional designer, I think one of the main
misconceptions of society is the perceived lack of quality in distance learning
programs. Most misconceptions can be
overcome simply by talking or showing individuals what a quality program
entails. As an instructional designer,
it will be important for me to follow the ADDIE process to ensure that the
goals of a program are clearly defined and that the best instructional
strategies and tools are utilized to meet those learning goals. It will also be important to publish the
successes of distance learning programs, and educate the public that quality
distance learning opportunities are available.
How will you be a positive force for continuous improvement in the field of
distance education?
Although there are days where I feel like I have only
just begun to scratch the surface on instructional technologies, it will be
important to stay current with new technological advances, and to continue to
learn and improve on distance learning theories and methods while incorporating
those advances in the products that I develop.
I generally have high
expectations for my work and that will continue as an instructional
designer. It will be important to meet
those expectations in terms of the development of courses and in working with
SME’s and other teams members. The
developments, advances, and collaboration with others combine to produce an
efficient and effective learning environment.
Overall, I want to make sure that I provide an environment in which the
student feels comfortable and productive.
I want to provide the best learning experience for each student that
logs on.
References
Gambescia,
S., & Paolucci, R. (2009). Academic fidelity and integrity as attributes of
university online degree program offerings.
Online Journal of Distance
Learning Administration, 12(1).
Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/spring
121/gambescia121.html
Moller,
L., Foshay, W., & Huett, J. (2008).
The evolution of distance education: Implications for instructional
design on the potential of the web (Part 2: Higher education). TechTrends,
52(4), 66-70.
Siemens,
G. (2010) The future of distance education. [video program]. Laureate
Education, Inc. Retrieved from sylvan.live.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=6290464&Survey=1&47=7309287&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=1&bhcp=1
Simonson,
M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th
ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Thursday, February 23
Converting to a Distance Learning Format
Converting a
traditionally Face-to-Face (F2F) course to a blended or hybrid course can be a
daunting task. One of the many features of blended courses is the
opportunity to utilize technology tools that add to the learning experiences of
your students while still maintaining a F2F environment. This week, we were
asked to aid a hypothetical training manager who wished to move his F2F course
to a blended format to improve the communications among the learners.
The trainer also wants to move the course resources online so that
learners may greater access to materials.
Questions to consider:
1.
What
are some of the pre-planning strategies the trainer needs to consider before
converting his program?
2.
What
aspects of his original training program could be enhanced in the distance
learning format?
3.
How
will his role, as trainer, change in a distance learning environment?
4.
What
steps should the trainer take to encourage the trainees to communicate online?
Pre-Planning Strategies
My initial conversations
with the instructor will guide the rest of the development of the hybrid
transformation. Gathering information
about his course, his goals for using a hybrid environment, and information
about his students will be invaluable for the course development. A learner analysis will help determine the
students' skills and readiness in using technology as a learning vehicle. An analysis of the instructor's goals for the
course can help define how the hybrid elements will incorporated into the
course. It will be very important for the instructor to establish for the
students an organized course, expectations, and student responsibilities (Simonson,
Smaldino, Albright, & Zvacek, 2012).
Distance Learning Format
Enhancements
Discussion forums,
wikis, and other tools provided by course management systems can help organize
and track student progress during a course.
The trainer will need to decide which type of website will best meet his
needs for the course and which tools will be added to the course for student
use. Specific guidelines and rubrics
would need to be developed, and included, to provide students with the desired
expectations for the online participation.
In this scenario, the instructor would like to enhance the students'
communications. Discussion boards for
each module or topic could be included as assignment, with a rubric that
describes appropriate online etiquette, quality of posts, and meeting the
requirements of the initial question or scenario. The instructor should carefully consider
several things when designing the discussion board aspect of the course. Careful attention to details concerning the initial
set up, participation, structure of questions, moderation of the forum, and
evaluations can provide for a more engaging and informative discussion (Wade,
Bentley, & Waters, 2006).
From Trainer to
Facilitator
As a traditional F2F
instructor, he is probably used to fulfilling the role as the provider of
content and 'sage on the stage'. As the
students communicate more with each other and with the content, the
instructor's role will need to shift from being the center of attention to that
of a facilitator who coaches the students along in their own learning. The instructor will need to adjust his
interaction with students and find "a balance between structure and creativity"
that provides enough support to students, but still allows them to think
creatively and critically about the content (Wade, Bentley, & Waters, 2006,
p. 3).
Encouragement to
Learners
As a facilitator in a
blended learning environment, he will need to monitor the discussion boards. He can offer encouragement to students by
commenting on their initial posts, asking questions about their thoughts, and
providing additional resources that relate the students' post to the course
content (such as an article about the course content and the student's career
field). It is important for the facilitator to be 'present' and adding pertinent
feedback to the discussion forums and not abandon the discussions to the
students' own devices. Instructors need
to monitor and support student engagement
in the online environment (Piskurich, n.d.).
The following table is a short checklist of items the instructor should consider when converting his course to include the online environment.
The following table is a short checklist of items the instructor should consider when converting his course to include the online environment.
| Where will the online course be hosted? Will a CMS be used? | |
| Is the instructor familiar with all of the technology tools and course components in the online environment? | |
| Will student help guides be available for those not familiar with the online environment and technology tools? | |
| How will the course components be organized? Will the topics and modules follow those in the face-to-face environment? | |
| How often will students be required to engage in the online environment? | |
| How will the discussion posts be evaluated? | |
| Provide contact information for the instructor and technical support. |
Resources
Simonson,
M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education (5th
ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.
Piskurich, G. (n.d.). Facilitating online
learning. [Study video]. Retrieved from http://sylvan.live.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=6290464&Survey=1&47=7309287&ClientNodeID=984650&coursenav=1&bhcp=1.
Wade, D. A., Bentley, J. P. H., Waters, S. H. (2006).
Twenty guidelines for successful threaded discussions: A learning environment
approach. Distance Learning, 3(3), p.
1-8.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)